Project Portfolios

Review Set

«

↓

»

Software Analytics

Open Source Projects

AI and Security

Keras

2.4.0Version: 2.4.0 Version Date: Jun 17, 2020, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:07:29 AM Build status: Successful

2.3.1Version: 2.3.1 Version Date: Oct 7, 2019, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:07:04 AM Build status: Successful

2.3.0Version: 2.3.0 Version Date: Sep 17, 2019, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:06:18 AM Build status: Successful

2.2.5Version: 2.2.5 Version Date: Aug 22, 2019, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:05:30 AM Build status: Successful

2.2.4Version: 2.2.4 Version Date: Oct 3, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:05:10 AM Build status: Successful

2.2.3Version: 2.2.3 Version Date: Oct 1, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:04:32 AM Build status: Successful

2.2.2Version: 2.2.2 Version Date: Jul 28, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:04:14 AM Build status: Successful

2.2.1Version: 2.2.1 Version Date: Jul 27, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:03:47 AM Build status: Successful

2.2.0Version: 2.2.0 Version Date: Jun 6, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:03:12 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.6Version: 2.1.6 Version Date: Apr 23, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:02:39 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.5Version: 2.1.5 Version Date: Mar 6, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:02:10 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.4Version: 2.1.4 Version Date: Feb 13, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:01:42 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.3Version: 2.1.3 Version Date: Jan 16, 2018, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:01:07 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.2Version: 2.1.2 Version Date: Dec 1, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:00:40 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.1Version: 2.1.1 Version Date: Nov 14, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 9:00:16 AM Build status: Successful

2.1.0Version: 2.1.0 Version Date: Nov 13, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:59:52 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.9Version: 2.0.9 Version Date: Nov 1, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:59:22 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.8Version: 2.0.8 Version Date: Aug 25, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:59:03 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.7Version: 2.0.7 Version Date: Aug 21, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:58:37 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.6Version: 2.0.6 Version Date: Jul 7, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:58:08 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.5Version: 2.0.5 Version Date: Jun 12, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:57:44 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.4Version: 2.0.4 Version Date: Apr 29, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:57:22 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.3Version: 2.0.3 Version Date: Apr 9, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:56:57 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.2Version: 2.0.2 Version Date: Mar 21, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:56:38 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.1Version: 2.0.1 Version Date: Mar 16, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:56:18 AM Build status: Successful

2.0.0Version: 2.0.0 Version Date: Mar 14, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:55:41 AM Build status: Successful

1.2.2Version: 1.2.2 Version Date: Feb 10, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:55:21 AM Build status: Successful

1.2.1Version: 1.2.1 Version Date: Jan 19, 2017, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:54:57 AM Build status: Successful

1.2.0Version: 1.2.0 Version Date: Dec 19, 2016, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:54:35 AM Build status: Successful

1.1.2Version: 1.1.2 Version Date: Nov 26, 2016, 12:00:00 AM Built on: Nov 30, 2020, 8:53:59 AM Build status: Successful

Scikit-learn

Back End Development

Front End Development

Web Framework

SortArtefacts

Keras (6)

setup.py (1)

docs (3)

examples (39)

tests (9)

keras (17)

update_api.py (1)

Collapse Expand

Indicators (Application)

Software Analytics

Code KPIs

Requirements KPIs

Resources KPIs

Tests KPIs

Tickets KPIs

Dashboard Highlights Findings Documents « ↓ » Code Quality Code Technical Debt Code Safety This chart use the result of the current filter.Key Performance Indicator Counting: Project Releases Counting: Project Releases Starting ReleaseMeasure: Starting Release Description: Release used as a starting point for the analysis. Nov 26, 2016=Current value: Nov 26, 2016 Reference value: Nov 26, 2016 Measure: Starting Release Description: Release used as a starting point for the analysis. Latest ReleaseMeasure: Latest Release Description: Latest release available for analysis. Jun 17, 2020↑Current value: Jun 17, 2020 Reference value: Oct 7, 2019 Measure: Latest Release Description: Latest release available for analysis. #ReleasesMeasure: #Releases Description: Total number of releases (builds) for this project. 30↑Current value: 30 Reference value: 29 Measure: #Releases Description: Total number of releases (builds) for this project. #Releases w/code changesMeasure: #Releases w/code changes Description: Total number of releases (builds) for this project where the code has changed. 30↑Current value: 30 Reference value: 29 Measure: #Releases w/code changes Description: Total number of releases (builds) for this project where the code has changed. Counting: Lines of code Counting: Lines of code Line CountMeasure: Line Count Description: Number of lines. 27,047↓Current value: 27,047 Reference value: 76,806 Measure: Line Count Description: Number of lines. Source Lines Of CodeMeasure: Source Lines Of Code Description: Number of lines of source code in the source file(s). 20,271↓Current value: 20,271 Reference value: 62,713 Measure: Source Lines Of Code Description: Number of lines of source code in the source file(s). Effective Lines Of CodeMeasure: Effective Lines Of Code Description: Number of effective lines of code 20,271↓Current value: 20,271 Reference value: 62,713 Measure: Effective Lines Of Code Description: Number of effective lines of code Executable StatementsMeasure: Executable Statements Description: Total number of executable statements. 14,540↓Current value: 14,540 Reference value: 34,899 Measure: Executable Statements Description: Total number of executable statements. Cyclomatic ComplexityMeasure: Cyclomatic Complexity Description: Cyclomatic Complexity Number (ref. McCabe[77]) 2,087↓Current value: 2,087 Reference value: 7,873 Measure: Cyclomatic Complexity Description: Cyclomatic Complexity Number (ref. McCabe[77]) Counting: Artefacts Counting: Artefacts Number of FilesMeasure: Number of Files Description: Total number of source code files. 160↓Current value: 160 Reference value: 187 Measure: Number of Files Description: Total number of source code files. Number of ClassesMeasure: Number of Classes Description: Total number of source code classes. 113↓Current value: 113 Reference value: 346 Measure: Number of Classes Description: Total number of source code classes. Number of algorithmic ModulesMeasure: Number of algorithmic Modules Description: The number of algorithmic Modules (i.e Functions in many languages) 1,302↓Current value: 1,302 Reference value: 3,529 Measure: Number of algorithmic Modules Description: The number of algorithmic Modules (i.e Functions in many languages) Number of Code Specifications artefactsMeasure: Number of Code Specifications artefacts Description: Total number of Code Specification artefacts in the source code. 0=Current value: 0 Reference value: 0 Measure: Number of Code Specifications artefacts Description: Total number of Code Specification artefacts in the source code. Compliance: Coding rules Compliance: Coding rules Rule ComplianceMeasure: Rule Compliance Description: Rule compliance indicates how well the project development team follows the coding guidelines. A rule is not compliant if at least one unjustified violation is detected. If a violation is relaxed/justified using the "relaxation feature", it will not impact rule compliance. This KPI is based on rules which nature is categorized as "Non Conformity". 50.00%↑Current value: 50.00% Reference value: 45.83% Measure: Rule Compliance Description: Rule compliance indicates how well the project development team follows the coding guidelines. A rule is not compliant if at least one unjustified violation is detected. If a violation is relaxed/justified using the "relaxation feature", it will not impact rule compliance. This KPI is based on rules which nature is categorized as "Non Conformity". Non Conformity CountMeasure: Non Conformity Count Description: Number of violations of rules with "Non Conformity" nature. Click to see findings filtered by: - Type: Violations - Categories: Nature->Non Conformity 470 violations↓Current value: 470 violations Reference value: 1,404 violations Measure: Non Conformity Count Description: Number of violations of rules with "Non Conformity" nature. Non Compliant StandardsMeasure: Non Compliant Standards Description: Number of non compliant rules (i.e. with at least one violation detected) This KPI is based on rules which nature is categorized as "Non Conformity". Click to see findings filtered by: - Type: Violations - Categories: Nature->Non Conformity 12 rules↓Current value: 12 rules Reference value: 13 rules Measure: Non Compliant Standards Description: Number of non compliant rules (i.e. with at least one violation detected) This KPI is based on rules which nature is categorized as "Non Conformity". Coding StandardsMeasure: Coding Standards Description: Number of verified rules with "Non Conformity" nature. Click to see findings filtered by: - Type: Project ruleset - Categories: Nature->Non Conformity 24 rules=Current value: 24 rules Reference value: 24 rules Measure: Coding Standards Description: Number of verified rules with "Non Conformity" nature. Compliance: HIS Compliance: HIS HIS-Metrics ComplianceMeasure: HIS-Metrics Compliance Description: HIS-Metrics Compliance 90.4%↑Current value: 90.4% Reference value: 89.5% Measure: HIS-Metrics Compliance Description: HIS-Metrics Compliance 'Comment Density' ComplianceMeasure: 'Comment Density' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the COMF: Comment density is equal to or higher than the HIS threshold: (Default value=20%). COMF is the "Relationship of the number of comments to the number of statements". 19.5%↑Current value: 19.5% Reference value: 15.5% Measure: 'Comment Density' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the COMF: Comment density is equal to or higher than the HIS threshold: (Default value=20%). COMF is the "Relationship of the number of comments to the number of statements". 'Cyclomatic Complexity' ComplianceMeasure: 'Cyclomatic Complexity' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the VG: Cyclomatic Complexity is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=10). In accordance with the Cyclomatic Number -definition "Cyclomatic Complexity" 99.3%↑Current value: 99.3% Reference value: 97.7% Measure: 'Cyclomatic Complexity' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the VG: Cyclomatic Complexity is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=10). In accordance with the Cyclomatic Number -definition "Cyclomatic Complexity" 'Nested Level' ComplianceMeasure: 'Nested Level' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the LEVEL: Maximum Nested Level is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=4). Depth of nesting of a function (Max depth +1) 99.3%↑Current value: 99.3% Reference value: 98.2% Measure: 'Nested Level' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the LEVEL: Maximum Nested Level is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=4). Depth of nesting of a function (Max depth +1) 'Non-Cyclic Path' ComplianceMeasure: 'Non-Cyclic Path' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the PATH: Number of non-cyclic paths is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=80). NPATH is the Number of non cyclic remark paths (i.e. minimum number of necessary cases of test) 99.1%↑Current value: 99.1% Reference value: 97.3% Measure: 'Non-Cyclic Path' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where the PATH: Number of non-cyclic paths is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=80). NPATH is the Number of non cyclic remark paths (i.e. minimum number of necessary cases of test) GOTO ComplianceMeasure: GOTO Compliance Description: Percentage of functions with no GOTO statement. 100%=Current value: 100% Reference value: 100% Measure: GOTO Compliance Description: Percentage of functions with no GOTO statement. 'RETURN Points' ComplianceMeasure: 'RETURN Points' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions with a single return point. 98.6%↑Current value: 98.6% Reference value: 92.4% Measure: 'RETURN Points' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions with a single return point. 'Language Scope' ComplianceMeasure: 'Language Scope' Compliance Description: Number of functions where VOCF: Language Scope is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=4.00). VOCF: Language Scope is the ratio between the number of distinct operands and operators and the total number of operands and operators. 72.7%↓Current value: 72.7% Reference value: 80.9% Measure: 'Language Scope' Compliance Description: Number of functions where VOCF: Language Scope is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=4.00). VOCF: Language Scope is the ratio between the number of distinct operands and operators and the total number of operands and operators. 'Number of Statements" ComplianceMeasure: 'Number of Statements" Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where STMT: Number of Statements lower than or equal to the HIS thresholds. The metric describes how complex is the function. 97.5%↓Current value: 97.5% Reference value: 97.7% Measure: 'Number of Statements" Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where STMT: Number of Statements lower than or equal to the HIS thresholds. The metric describes how complex is the function. 'Number of Parameters' ComplianceMeasure: 'Number of Parameters' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where PARAM: Number of function parameters is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=5). The metric describes how complex is the function interface. 99.2%↑Current value: 99.2% Reference value: 94.7% Measure: 'Number of Parameters' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where PARAM: Number of function parameters is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=5). The metric describes how complex is the function interface. 'Number of Calling' ComplianceMeasure: 'Number of Calling' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where CALLING: Number of calling functions is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=5). The metric describes by how many functions is this function called. 100%=Current value: 100% Reference value: 100% Measure: 'Number of Calling' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions where CALLING: Number of calling functions is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=5). The metric describes by how many functions is this function called. 'Number of Calls' ComplianceMeasure: 'Number of Calls' Compliance Description: Number of functions where CALLS: Number of distinct calls is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=7). The metric describes how many different functions does this function call. Calling the same subfunction counts only once. 100%=Current value: 100% Reference value: 100% Measure: 'Number of Calls' Compliance Description: Number of functions where CALLS: Number of distinct calls is lower than or equal to the HIS threshold: (Default value=7). The metric describes how many different functions does this function call. Calling the same subfunction counts only once. 'Recursion' ComplianceMeasure: 'Recursion' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions not potentialy involved in recursion over one or more functions. 100%=Current value: 100% Reference value: 100% Measure: 'Recursion' Compliance Description: Percentage of functions not potentialy involved in recursion over one or more functions. Analytics: Code comments Analytics: Code comments Self DescriptivenessMeasure: Self Descriptiveness Description: Self Descriptiveness (Percentage of modules which respect the quality expectation of source code comment) 89.1%↑Current value: 89.1% Reference value: 82.1% Measure: Self Descriptiveness Description: Self Descriptiveness (Percentage of modules which respect the quality expectation of source code comment) Comment RateMeasure: Comment Rate Description: Ratio between the number of lines of comments and the number of source lines of code. 9.7%↑Current value: 9.7% Reference value: 5.7% Measure: Comment Rate Description: Ratio between the number of lines of comments and the number of source lines of code. Comment - Compliant ModulesMeasure: Comment - Compliant Modules Description: Comment - Compliant Modules 1,160↓Current value: 1,160 Reference value: 2,896 Measure: Comment - Compliant Modules Description: Comment - Compliant Modules Number of algorithmic ModulesMeasure: Number of algorithmic Modules Description: The number of algorithmic Modules (i.e Functions in many languages) 1,302↓Current value: 1,302 Reference value: 3,529 Measure: Number of algorithmic Modules Description: The number of algorithmic Modules (i.e Functions in many languages) Analytics: Code complexity Analytics: Code complexity Ratio of complex modulesMeasure: Ratio of complex modules Description: Ratio of complex algorithmic modules 7.8%↑Current value: 7.8% Reference value: 6.3% Measure: Ratio of complex modules Description: Ratio of complex algorithmic modules Number of algorithmic ModulesMeasure: Number of algorithmic Modules Description: The number of algorithmic Modules (i.e Functions in many languages) 1,302↓Current value: 1,302 Reference value: 3,529 Measure: Number of algorithmic Modules Description: The number of algorithmic Modules (i.e Functions in many languages) Class Complexity RatioMeasure: Class Complexity Ratio Description: Ratio of complex classes 0.1%↓Current value: 0.1% Reference value: 5.3% Measure: Class Complexity Ratio Description: Ratio of complex classes Number of ClassesMeasure: Number of Classes Description: Total number of source code classes. 113↓Current value: 113 Reference value: 346 Measure: Number of Classes Description: Total number of source code classes. Analytics: Technical Debt Analytics: Technical Debt Technical DebtMeasure: Technical Debt Description: Technical debt of the artefact 22M/d↓Current value: 22M/d Reference value: 55M/d 3h Measure: Technical Debt Description: Technical debt of the artefact New Technical DebtMeasure: New Technical Debt Description: New Technical Debt 2h 45min↑Current value: 2h 45min Reference value: 0 Measure: New Technical Debt Description: New Technical Debt Modified Technical DebtMeasure: Modified Technical Debt Description: Modified Technical Debt 5M/d 3h↑Current value: 5M/d 3h Reference value: 1M/d 1h Measure: Modified Technical Debt Description: Modified Technical Debt Unchanged Technical DebtMeasure: Unchanged Technical Debt Description: Unchanged Technical Debt 16M/d 1h↓Current value: 16M/d 1h Reference value: 54M/d 1h Measure: Unchanged Technical Debt Description: Unchanged Technical Debt Showcase: Snippet KPIs Showcase: Snippet KPIs Software AnalyticsMeasure: Software Analytics Description: Software Analytics rating agregates ratings sub level indicators. KPI are those who impact the Software Analytics rating: Source Code: Violations Density: based on the density of violation per kloc (more details in findings tab). Code Cloning: based on percentage clones and duplication in the application (more details in the findings tab). Complexity: based on the distribution and volume of complex class/module. Rule Compliance: based on the ratio of coding rules which are not violated. Code Coverage: based on the ratio of modules which are compliant with the coverage settings. Self Descriptiveness: based on the quality of source code comment. Ticket Management: Maturity Index: Capacity of the team to close defects (Ratio= #closed tickets / #total tickets) Target Completion: In the scope of the ToDo list for the current analysis, it shows the progression of the closed tasks. Innovation Rate: In the scope of the ToDo list, it shows the ratio of enhancement. Test: Test Effectiveness: Based on the test success rate (Ratio= #Passed / #total) Impact of sub level indicator is exponentially linked to its rating: ◼ A weight = 0 ◼ B weight = 0.03125 ◼ C weight = 0.0625 ◼ D weight = 0.125 ◼ E weight = 0.25 ◼ F weight = 0.5 ◼ G weight = 1 ◼ ? or Off: KPI is ignored and not used in the rating 0=Current value: 0 Reference value: 0 Measure: Software Analytics Description: Software Analytics rating agregates ratings sub level indicators. KPI are those who impact the Software Analytics rating: Source Code: Violations Density: based on the density of violation per kloc (more details in findings tab). Code Cloning: based on percentage clones and duplication in the application (more details in the findings tab). Complexity: based on the distribution and volume of complex class/module. Rule Compliance: based on the ratio of coding rules which are not violated. Code Coverage: based on the ratio of modules which are compliant with the coverage settings. Self Descriptiveness: based on the quality of source code comment. Ticket Management: Maturity Index: Capacity of the team to close defects (Ratio= #closed tickets / #total tickets) Target Completion: In the scope of the ToDo list for the current analysis, it shows the progression of the closed tasks. Innovation Rate: In the scope of the ToDo list, it shows the ratio of enhancement. Test: Test Effectiveness: Based on the test success rate (Ratio= #Passed / #total) Impact of sub level indicator is exponentially linked to its rating: ◼ A weight = 0 ◼ B weight = 0.03125 ◼ C weight = 0.0625 ◼ D weight = 0.125 ◼ E weight = 0.25 ◼ F weight = 0.5 ◼ G weight = 1 ◼ ? or Off: KPI is ignored and not used in the rating Technical DebtMeasure: Technical Debt Description: Technical debt of the artefact 22M/d↓Current value: 22M/d Reference value: 55M/d 3h Measure: Technical Debt Description: Technical debt of the artefact Complexity Volume RatioMeasure: Complexity Volume Ratio Description: Complexity Volume Ratio (Size ratio of very complex modules within the project) 3.8%↓Current value: 3.8% Reference value: 8.1% Measure: Complexity Volume Ratio Description: Complexity Volume Ratio (Size ratio of very complex modules within the project) New Code Stability IndexMeasure: New Code Stability Index Description: New Stability Index as the percentage of unchanged code between two versions of the artefact 65.6%↓Current value: 65.6% Reference value: 99.9% Measure: New Code Stability Index Description: New Stability Index as the percentage of unchanged code between two versions of the artefact Code ActivityMeasure: Code Activity Description: Variation of the project Code Activity, based on the Stability since the previous version -100%↓Current value: -100% Reference value: 21.1% Measure: Code Activity Description: Variation of the project Code Activity, based on the Stability since the previous version Code CloningMeasure: Code Cloning Description: Code Cloning agregates information on textual duplication and algorithmic cloning. This KPI also evaluates whether the cloning come from: internal (inside the component) or external (similar to other component) Internal Vs External Inner (or Internal) Cloning is related to the cloning within the artifact : is the artifact well designed? Outer (or External) Cloning is related to the cloning outside the artifact : is the artifact cloned with another artefact? Algorithmic Cloning Vs Code Duplication Duplication is directly computed from the textual analysis of the sources code. Cloning is rather related to the algorithm of the source code (based on Control Flow Analysis). Cloning Findings: In order to efficiently visualize cloning, Squore produces cloning findings which are available in the findings tab. 0.03=Current value: 0.03 Reference value: 0.03 Measure: Code Cloning Description: Code Cloning agregates information on textual duplication and algorithmic cloning. This KPI also evaluates whether the cloning come from: internal (inside the component) or external (similar to other component) Internal Vs External Inner (or Internal) Cloning is related to the cloning within the artifact : is the artifact well designed? Outer (or External) Cloning is related to the cloning outside the artifact : is the artifact cloned with another artefact? Algorithmic Cloning Vs Code Duplication Duplication is directly computed from the textual analysis of the sources code. Cloning is rather related to the algorithm of the source code (based on Control Flow Analysis). Cloning Findings: In order to efficiently visualize cloning, Squore produces cloning findings which are available in the findings tab. Code Cloning RatioMeasure: Code Cloning Ratio Description: Percentage of duplicated code in this artefact 1.9%↑Current value: 1.9% Reference value: 1.1% Measure: Code Cloning Ratio Description: Percentage of duplicated code in this artefact Language Distribution ISO25010 Quality Breakdown Coding Rules Violations Code Cloning Trends Function Complexity Map Coding Rule Violations [Default Filters] [Reset Values] Save Save as... Remove Type Folder Javascript File Javascript Function Javascript Script Python Class Python File Python Function Python Main Level Unknown Off Level A Level B Level C Level D Level E Level F Level G Evolution Improved Deteriorated Stable New Status Normal Relaxed Compare with version: - 2.3.1 2.3.0 2.2.5 2.2.4 2.2.3 2.2.2 2.2.1 2.2.0 2.1.6 2.1.5 2.1.4 2.1.3 2.1.2 2.1.1 2.1.0 2.0.9 2.0.8 2.0.7 2.0.6 2.0.5 2.0.4 2.0.3 2.0.2 2.0.1 2.0.0 1.2.2 1.2.1 1.2.0 1.1.2 Hide versions created before:

Sort By

Name

A-Z

Z-A

Level

Worst first

Best first

View Excluded Artefacts

Add Filtered Results to Review Set

• Build
• Apply Changes
• Reapply Model
• Manage
• Baseline

• ---

• Clear unapplied changes
• Reset to last baseline

• View Milestones

• Pin to Home Page
• Comment...

• ---

• Remove from Review Set
• Delete

• Add to Review Set
• Pin to Home Page
• Comment...
• Share...

• ---

• Relax...
• Un-relax...
• Exclude...
• Un-exclude...
• Add an artefact...
• Close artefact
• Add a finding...

• ---

• Log...